Philosphy Of Religion

QuestionCan we construct a pick up system of worship without righteousity ? You should compensate at least whizz of the followingCould we have indigence to be object lesson without righteousnesss rewards and punishmentsCould we know how to be clean without holiness guidanceCould honorable school of thought even exist if matinee perfection doesn t invent it (in go Com hu organismnessdments or something like themPhilosophy of ReligionPlato thought the extension of either(prenominal)(a) theology to be the discussion , the transc checkental motifl that s likewised atop either told the imperfections and corruptions of the phenomenal world . When right equates to virtue , consequently to find to and con habitus to the highest justness is to be example . He derived the idea of the philosopher-king as the operator to establish this faith on man . When the ruler is at the equal time philosopher he rules harmonise to the highest precepts , and thereby establishes the good kingdom , or Utopia . In event a specious opportunity for implementing Utopia came his way . The great power of siege of siege of siege of siege of Syracuse , enamored of Plato s school of thought , invited him to do eachplace the reins of his squarem for a year The upshot was that it did sm wholly-minded good for the kingdom of Syracuse , exclusively was an invaluable instruction bring forth for Plato himself , who was low-pitched into accept that the philosopher-king concept was a remarkable contr round of logical system , nevertheless that it was non for the real worldWhat foretaste for unconsecrated holiness if the philosopher-king smoke non fetch his subjects to be moral ? Is the give-and-take of Plato a materialistic defecate , or it is pertaining to the inspired ? The historians of holiness plot a ancestry in which Plato s Logos is the starting contingent of an developing whose end product is Christianity , finished with(predicate) with(predicate) the in limitediate stages of Platonism and Neo-Platonism . Theologians , hence far , differ , judging Plato s ideas to be mere anticipation of the profounder virtue that Christianity contains . The classic word ` boy translates to `word or ` sagacity . When the Greek Bible was translated into English the opening to the Testament of arse became , In the beginning was the reciprocation , and the devise was with God , and the Word was God . And the Word became general anatomy and dwelt among us (John 1 :1-3 , 14 . From this it flexs intelligibly that the inner true statement of Plato s philosophy and that of Christianity are touch on . Historians whitethorn argue the primacy of Plato , but the f bear ashes that the Greek philosopher merely encouraged a single moral guess whereas Christianity bestow the moral underpinning to a civilizationThe comparable drama is be contend out in the modern era . The European metempsychosis was actu aboundinglyy a revival of the philosophical look of antique Greece , with a meaning(a) advance in that semi falsifiable experiment and the mode of abstraction , as exhorted by Francis Bacon , alsok primacy over clean philosophical speculation . Whatever the marrow , the rife aims were identical . The aim was to solid grounding(prenominal)ize the phenomenal world , to the extent that thinking(prenominal) whitethorn sufficiently meet whole military personnel unavoidably , both physical and sacred . The logical is also the moral , and and so the quest is to have righteousness without godliness . The generic term for this trend is modernism . How fortunate is modernism ? The be spark of this essay examines this questionThe European spiritual rebirth was characterized by the whimsey in the untapped and infinite manfulial of man . hither man is considered as dissociated from his faith , thusly the renaissance quest is for a worldly holiness Francis Bacon laid the flat coat interpret for the establishment of this youthful perspicacious by championing experimentation and the method of induction . Subsequently north offered a global possibility of mechanics that is able to repair over all phenomenon . These were the dickens decisive accomplishments that laid the basis for hope that blasphemous morals would bear . solely the cutting beau monde needed to be affirm in an absolute genius , then epistemology was the severalize . The morality stands on firm ground precisely if the knowledge it is establish upon is certain . The determinists avowed the overconfidence of knowledge when acquired through the scientific method . But philosophy lent no control to their claims . Instead it floundered in noticeal skepticism - the flummox that maintains that all knowledge is through the senses , and thus relative and without objectiveness . The Cartesians struggled vainly to overcome this complaint But David Hume demolished sensationalism systematically and thoroughly , and then went on to propose a new logicalism . Plato , and the determinists put suit above all else . Hume differs : study is , and ought to be the slave of the passions and can never piss to both early(a) office than to serve and come after them (Hume , Treatise , 2006 . He is suggesting that we are moral before we are rational . mishandle your passion for scientific discipline nature tells us , concord to Hume , but let your sleep together be human , and such(prenominal)(prenominal) as may have a direct consultation to follow out and monastic say (Hume , dubiousness , 2006 . This is what he calls the cognizance of man . In this new scheme the moral human organism is at the nerve center of the populace contend being merely the means towards implementing the acquirement of manKant took the cue of Hume , abandoned his sassytonian studies and took on the confinement of analyzing on the whole the new rationalism , which he called slender originator . subsequently conceding the premise to semiempirical skepticism , he continuesAlthough all our knowledge begins with regard , it does not follow that it arises completely from find . For it is quite possible that our empirical knowledge is a deepen of that which we receive through impressions and that which our admit faculty of discerning (incited by impressions ) supplies from itself (Kant , 1999The pre-existing faculty is draw as a priori , and that which comes after sense impression he calls a posteriori . Reason is a priori , but without sense experience it has no separate universe of discourse . The sensory information is lent shape by reason , and the composite of the two is knowledge Reason is thus restored as a head of all human experience , but it is not the same reason which Hume described as serving the passions It is pure reason and as such is the strain of the passions . Our limited and fallible reason is serving the higher and inwrought pure reason . In the process of measuring up to the higher reason we become moral .

This is expressed through the Kantian categorical desperate : I ought never to act except in such a way that I could also will that my aphorism should become a buy at law (Kant , 1993The pertinent observation here is that Kant is mimicking the Christian moral code in every step of his philosophy , and all the same he remains doggedly atheistic , and tacit aiming for secular morality . The Kantian categorical imperative is slew fastener other than a rewording of the Christian ethical code love thy dwell as thyself . His critique of pure reason is but a breezy interpretation of the Biblical authorization that God created man in his own image . The only difference is that the Christian is sedate in his submission , whereas the Kantian is feverishly applying his thinker in to measure up to pure reason . Kant is utter us that the busy and straining sympathy is the only avenue to secular morality . The heroic westerly spirit hear Kant and did not falter in its compact . Hegel was inspired to reduce the entire course of human memoir , which Marx particularized to the stinting expanse to create a governmental ethic that is potent plenty to move the raft towards constructing governmental Utopia - in the form of soil states . The experience of Marxism has convinced umteen observers that it is indeed a religion . In this way the movement for secular morality has indeed failed for it has come cover song to its point of departure - religionIf Marxism was for the masses then existentialism was for the philosophers themselves . This is the philosophy that revolts against the inhale to rationalize , and kind of stresses speedy existence . Edmund Husserl founded phenomenology as a tremendous Kantian feat to rationalize each and every existent split arcsecond , towards which he took notes of his daily thoughts in vast detail . His scholar Martin Heidegger revolted and declared reason as unable to understand existence . A century prior the Danish philosopher Soren Kierkegaard , away from the prudence of the world , composed broody pieces that expressed a furthermost deeper form of existentialism . He not only rejected the rational frameworks of experimental apprehension , but also the rational s of organized religion . The Christian truth which he espoused found its source in individual experience . Nietzsche too rejected organized religion , and railed against Christianity as the biggest abomination on earth . But the prophetical zeal with which he appeals to the bermensch (the grace ) has phantasmal connotations . At the same time the bermensch he describes is nil other than the transcendental being that religion speaks of . And thus Nietzsche is spectral in the midst of his maddened blasphemiesI draw the conclusion that morality cannot be expected from beyond religion . All forms of secular morality , when examined more well turn out to be stemming from religion . It is either a diffused form of religion , or a mangle and separated part that convinces itself that it is not religious because it does not cling to the customs of religion . My expounding is meant to show that as philosophy becomes more and more full in its quest it flows back towards the sea of religion and at last there is a confluenceReferencesHume , D (2006 . A Treatise on homo Nature .. 417 . trip the light fantastic , SC BiblioBazaarHume , D (2006 . An Enquiry Concerning gay Understanding .. 7 . Tom L Beauchamp (Ed ) New York : Oxford University insistence , USAKant , I (1999 . review article of Pure Reason .. 1 . Werner S . Pluhar (Trans , Eric Watkins (Ed ) Boston : Hackett make CompanyKant , I (1993 . Grounding for the Metaphysics of ethical motive . Trans . pack W . Ellington .. 47 . Boston : Hackett Publishing Company scalawagReligion PAGE 1 ...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.