Law Court Case Review

IntroductionThe cocktail dress of Massachusetts v Woodward (1997 ) involved some uncomparable brains of law and conclusion in the savage justice constitution . The most important level spikeed issue related to the passel when a trial venture could or could not stand up a control panel finding of fact and substitute one of his surrender The most important important issue was the application of the jolted baby syndrome These issues involved the exponentiation of a number of parties from the line of battle of assure to the judges seance in the Massachusetts domineering Court . The following disucssion follows the division players by tracing the bailiwick from the frontmost trial to its eventual(prenominal) conclusionFactual BackgroundIn 1996 , Louise Woodward of England , then 18 age old was hired by Sumil and Deborah Eappen of Masachussets to provide au twin services in take to be of their devil boys one of whom was Matthew , an 8 month old child . On Feburary 4 , 1997 Louise Woodward , containing that she had ingraft Matthew unresponsive telephoned 911 . Approximately five dollar bill days later Matthew would expose as a moment of clearance injuries Police master that Woodward had admitted being a pocketable rough with Matthew and arrested herThe role of the patrol is one of security charge I that they function in the community as unrestricted security withstanders . In to keep the peace they are charged with the responsibility of detecting , preventing and analyse criminal top . As such they play opposite roles in the pursuit of offenders . They question suspects and run acrosses as substantially as collar somatic evidence and are lots key pursuance visualisees at criminal trialsThe Jury TrialAt Woodward s jury trial devil vastly different cases were presented to the jury whose credit line it was to listen to the evidence and fall whether or not the facts support the charge of remove .

The criminal prosecution charged with the burden of proof beyond sightly motion argued that Woodward shook Matthwe and slammed him on a threatening turn up The prosecution alleged that Louise Woodward s conduct was brought on by two contributing factors . In the first place she had force append agitated with Matthew who would not part with crying and secondly she had give way angry with the Mr .and Mrs . Eappen for attempting to impose a curfew on her These asseverates were substantiated by the presentaiton of witness testimony and expert witnessesThe prosecution called a Matthew and these doctors included a neurosurgeon , an opthalmologist two pathologists , a radiologist and child wickedness experts . Each of these witnesses testified that they were of the opinin that the tribal chief injuries keep up by Matthew had occurred as a direct result of hard shaking and the impact of his head coming into contact with a hard surface . The defense force reaction team denied this claim arguing that had matthew sustained his head injuries in this manner at that place should have been injuries to his neck as well and since there weren t each neck injuries the prosecution s claim on that point had not been metWoodward defense lawyers argued by abduce evidence from expert...If you want to affirm a full essay, hunting lodge it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.